HOME
TOPICS
ABOUT ME
M AIL

 
They come alive with what seems like a surfaceless presence; the image appears to be in the surface of the print, not on it. The image has a third dimension, depth, that it cannot have in a traditional print.
  technofile
Al Fasoldt's reviews and commentaries, continuously available online since 1983

T e c h n o f i l e
Epson's pigmented-ink printers and professional matte paper make spectacular fade-free photo prints


July 6, 2003


By Al Fasoldt
Copyright © 2003, Al Fasoldt
Copyright © 2003, The Post-Standard

   My wife was blue in the face. I was sickly green. My cat was supposed to be black with a little white diamond on his forehead, but he was an ugly purple with yellow markings.
   Nearly all the prints we'd made from our digital pictures took on this sort of ghoulish look after they started fading. Family portraits made us look like the Munsters, and some of my treasured prints from our week-long walking tour of Paris looked like they'd been taken beneath the sea.
   Was there a way out of this absurdity? Digital photos cost a lot to print when you add the cost of ink and paper. Shouldn't they last longer without turning sickly shades of blue and green?
   The answer is simple. You make a printer that uses paint instead of ink.
   Printer companies don't call such a magic ink formula "paint," of course. That would scare buyers away in a hurry. They call it "pigmented ink." Inkjet pigments are tiny colored particles suspended in liquid. Regular ink is made from colored dyes.
   Pigments aren't chemicals and don't fade the way the chemicals in dye-based ink do. But a big problem kept most pigmented inks out of the consumer market until recently. Pigmented inks didn't settle into the fibers of inkjet paper very well. They tended to sit on top, adding an unflattering metallic sheen to parts of photos.
   Epson, the leading manufacturer of inkjet printers, solved that problem when it introduced the model 2000P photo-quality printer about a year ago. The company also designed a companion matte-finish paper for the 2000P, originally called Archival Matte (now called Enhanced Matte). The 2000P's matte-finish photos should last three-quarters of a century or more without fading, according to experts who have tested Epson's claims of extremely stable prints.
   (The 2000P has been replaced by the model 2200, but they work very much the same.)
   Epson's new matte paper absorbs pigmented ink exceptionally well. As you might expect, photos printed on Enhanced Matte paper look slightly dull until you mount them under glass, in a suitable frame. Displayed that way, they come alive with what seems like a surfaceless presence; the image appears to be in the surface of the print, not on it. The image has a third dimension, depth, that it cannot have in a traditional print.
   Print quality such as this isn't cheap. The Epson 2000P might still be available -- it was selling in refurbished-but-as-new condition on eBay recently for $365, about a third of its list price -- but the 2200 isn't being discounted much below its $700 list price. Epson's Enhanced Matte paper lists for $18 for a pack of 50 letter-size sheets, but I've found it for about $12 using a Google search. Both the 2000P and the 2200 can handle much larger paper, too, in both sheets and rolls. The efficiency of using rolls of paper can bring down the cost quite a bit.
   The prints I get from my Epson 2000P using the company's "Enhanced Matte" paper aren't just good; they might well be museum-quality. One of those prints, a digital photo I took of a tiny salamander sunning itself on a rusted car in the Everglades, will be shown at the Everson Museum of Art in Syracuse this fall. (I'll put a notice of the date of the exhibition on my Web site later this summer.)